1920s Locomotives.

1920s Locomotives.
Lord Nelson and Gladstone, May 1927..

Monday 28 April 2014

226- 233. A curious LSWR bunch.

226. LSWR 733 The Bug, 4-2-4 which was Drummond's personal transport and could reach 85 mph.. (Locomotive Publishing Co). Its saloon ended up as a garden shed in Swanage.

227. LSWR 737, Class C14 light shunter, built 1907,  sold to the Admiralty.  (Locomotive Publishing Co). Martin Long suggests S14 - will check.

228. 0-4-4 211 with some mysterious gismos (air brakes). Built 1882, Class 02, became W20 Shanklin.

 229. (L)SWR 243. M7 Class 0-4-4. The 1897 conical smoke-box door, to make room for an experimental spark inhibitor. Note also the fashion for SWR abbreviation. The M7 245 is currently at the NRM York.

230. (L)SWR 693  0-6-0 Drummond 700 class, at Nine Elms.

231. LSWR 735, a LB&SCR Stroudley A1 0-6-0T, No. 68 (668) Clapham (built Brighton 1874)sold to LSWR to become 735, here just repainted in 1903. Note the feedwater heater.  Worked at Lyme Regis. (F Moore Railway Photographs)

232. LSWR 101. I think this was the original K14 small dock tank built 1907 before it was given a larger boiler to become the B4 of the same number, named Dinan in 1908(F Moore Railway Photographs). Martin Long says S14 - will check.

233. The same class but now as a B4 with a larger boiler and consequent rebuilding. It now looks precarious on its 0-4-0 wheelbase. Granville is number 102, built 1893.Now preserved at Bressingham, near Diss, Norfolk.

7 comments:

  1. Photo 228. Is one of two O2s sent to the Isle of Wight early in 1923 in lswr livery ,the gizmos are the air brake equipment used on the island. No 206 was the other O2,

    ReplyDelete
  2. Photo 232. Is one of two 0-4-0T S14 class built for pull-push gate stock trains, similar to photo 227. They were under powered were sold to the War Dept as shunters.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Replies
    1. Photo 227 is a class C14 2-2-0T , Photo 232 is a class S14 both classes were built for the same pull-push gate stock trains as shown in Photo 227.

      Delete
  4. There is some mistake with the caption to photo 229, which is clearly an 0-4-4T and not a Beattie Well tank 0-4-2T

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Jane, a while ago since I did these. You are right of course and many thanks. 243 was a Beattie Well Tank but was put on the duplicate list and replaced by a new M7, which is pictured here. The M7 no. 245 is in the NRM. Stephen

      Delete
  5. I wish to purchase one of the photos of LSWR 101 for a book I am wrting so how do I do that as there are no sites that allow me to do so?

    ReplyDelete